Why this exists
Software rarely fails on the day it ships. It fails two years later, when the person who understood it has left, the dependencies are stale, nobody has tested a restore, and the only documentation is the original proposal. That is not bad luck - it is the predictable result of treating go-live as the finish line.
The work
What we do
- Build recovery that has been tested, not a backup job nobody has restored from
- Keep dependencies and platforms current, in small steps rather than rescue projects
- Harden access and audit in waves, sequenced by real exposure
- Engineer cost down - idle environments scaled to zero, the rest right-sized
Deliverables
What you get
- A platform that stays current instead of quietly ageing
- An access model and audit trail that survives diligence
- Runbooks for the operations that genuinely need a human
Edges
Where it stops
What we don't touch
Your team's autonomy. This is a backstop for a system you still own and can still change.
Done when
ongoing - this one is a standing arrangement rather than a project with an end date.
Next step
Start with discovery.
Whether this is the right piece of work is exactly what discovery answers.